Welcome Drezha
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9725
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Welcome Drezha
Welcome to the Team (on multiple projects, from Phoenix Rising)
regards,
Tim
regards,
Tim
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
Cheers for the welcome.
Never expected a welcome
Getting a bit disillusioned with it over at TPR. Couple of comments made have made me think twice about staying there.
Anyhow at the minute I'm not crunching BOINC, I'm into Folding@home as last BOINC I ran was SIMAP and that was taking a large chunk of bandwidth etc, I've just moved back to Leeds and didn't know whether the connection would be bandwidth limited...
Anyhow...I'm yet to decide to wheather fully move teams to here and wether to move back onto BOINC.
Never expected a welcome

Getting a bit disillusioned with it over at TPR. Couple of comments made have made me think twice about staying there.

Anyhow at the minute I'm not crunching BOINC, I'm into Folding@home as last BOINC I ran was SIMAP and that was taking a large chunk of bandwidth etc, I've just moved back to Leeds and didn't know whether the connection would be bandwidth limited...
Anyhow...I'm yet to decide to wheather fully move teams to here and wether to move back onto BOINC.

-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
I'm a fan of the protein projects.
SIMAP I'd probably start again. I do like CPDN as well. Predictor I became a bit disillusioned with but I ran it for a while...
Rosetta I've given up on...the credit system is completely unfair IMHO and I don't see how selective WU's = good science...
I did signup to the UK CPDN version one (the high requirement one) but it wouldn't let me get in and change my name.
I think I'll give it another go. Is there a monitoring application that offers more stats and the like since I left BOINC a while ago?
SIMAP I'd probably start again. I do like CPDN as well. Predictor I became a bit disillusioned with but I ran it for a while...
Rosetta I've given up on...the credit system is completely unfair IMHO and I don't see how selective WU's = good science...
I did signup to the UK CPDN version one (the high requirement one) but it wouldn't let me get in and change my name.
I think I'll give it another go. Is there a monitoring application that offers more stats and the like since I left BOINC a while ago?
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
I meant a processor optmised core to increase the benchmarks. Or in my absence, are all the projects bringing in the SETI beta way of doing things?UBT - Halifax--lad wrote: SIMAP is working fine here and the science app is already highly optimised without and additions needed of an external optimised app.
Doesn't seem like a bad area to live mind.

EDIT:
SIMAP working fine here now as well. It was down ealier when I tried about 5

-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
Increasing benchmarks is classed as cheating by most participants in BOINC luckily SIMAP as a quorum of 3 which means such cheating can't really happen as 3 results have got to be compared before credit is givenDrezha wrote:I meant a processor optmised core to increase the benchmarks. Or in my absence, are all the projects bringing in the SETI beta way of doing things?
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
Yes anything that alters the benchmarks to make them higher is classed as cheating, luckily most projects are now jumping on the bandwagon to stop inflated benchmarks & optimised BOINC apps from claiming the higher credit. Very few projects now have a quorum of one and the ones that do are mainly test projects
It would probably be more accurate to say Increasing benchmarks is classed as cheating by some participants in BOINCDrezha wrote:So using the optimised BOINC applications that Cruncher made was classed as cheating?
These views are mostly voiced in the relevant project forums.
It should be remembered that the percentage of users that post to project forums is tiny and that the percentage of those that think the above is cheating is also tiny.
So all in all, a very small but quite vocal number of users believe the above is cheating.

-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
UBT - Halifax--lad wrote:Increasing benchmarks is classed as cheating by most participants in BOINC luckily SIMAP as a quorum of 3 which means such cheating can't really happen as 3 results have got to be compared before credit is givenDrezha wrote:I meant a processor optmised core to increase the benchmarks. Or in my absence, are all the projects bringing in the SETI beta way of doing things?
For genuine (but slow) crunchers a quorum of 3 is not a good thing. I know little about this "cheating" but I was robbed :evil: of about 140 credits for SETI when the longer workunits came in. Only one other cruncher returned their results so the quorum of 3 was not reached and at the time that amounted to about a weeks crunching wasted. I now mostly Rosetta and a bit of Xtremlab where the credit is instant.
Last edited by UBT-mark3346 on Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
You don't waste time at all just have to wait for the quorum to be met sometimes it happens straight away other times you may have to wait a bit for results to come inUBT-mark3346 wrote:Only one other cruncher returned their results so the quorum of 3 was not reached and at the time that amounted to about a weeks crunching wasted
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9725
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
UBT-mark3346 wrote:For genuine (but slow) crunchers a quorum of 3 is not a good thing. I know little about this "cheating" but I was robbed :evil: of about 140 credits for SETI when the longer workunits came in. Only one other cruncher returned their results so the quorum of 3 was not reached and at the time that amounted to about a weeks crunching wasted. I now mostly Rosetta and a bit of extreme where the credit is instant.
The thing about the quorum, is that even if some of the original WU's are not returned, and hence your returned work is "pending", eventually, the project will get around to re-sending it out again (and again and again, if needs be, until quorum is met).
So you WILL get your credit - just sometimes it might take longer.
You won't lose out. The credit will arrive (assuming it validates OK). Just need to be a little patient
regards,
Tim
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
Oh well, I guess they didn't validate then as it has been ages since the deadline passed and they no longer show as pending credit (they were pending a while which was unusual as I was not the fastest to return most results so got the credit fairly quickly). I had checked while they were pending and I know one other returned them with about the same credit claimed but the other probably did not complete them as they had loads of more recent workunits done but a chunk of older ones was not. 

-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9725
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Re: Welcome Drezha
I think Drezha has gone back to Phoenix Rising.....!UBT - Timbo wrote:Welcome to the Team (on multiple projects, from Phoenix Rising)
regards,
Tim
eg:
on Einstein
http://www.boincsynergy.com/stats/team- ... h&team=173
on BBC CCE
http://www.boincsynergy.com/stats/team- ... ce&team=12
maybe others - too upset to look !!!
oh well.......
regards
Tim
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9725
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Think he might still be attached to UBT on some projects but must wait for the stats sites to update themselves - he was active on many projects and as such, I can't be a*sed to look them all up......UBT - Halifax--lad wrote:Never mind can't keep them all, anyway he wasn't doing any BOINC work at this particular moment in time when he joined us he was just doing folding
Shame. But he might be back.....
regards,
Tim
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
I'm just finishing a 40+ hour work unit on Folding@home :?
When I tried BOINC earlier on, it would appear to have clashed with my firewall. I need to work around it (and forward a port on my router) to allow it to access it.
The aim is to say round here a bit more and see if I want my credits with the team.
Not a decision I'll take likely...espcially now as energy is increasing in price...
When I tried BOINC earlier on, it would appear to have clashed with my firewall. I need to work around it (and forward a port on my router) to allow it to access it.

The aim is to say round here a bit more and see if I want my credits with the team.

-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am