Server Status is still showing no work to be sent. Hope everyone has got at least one backup project.September 7, 2007
We are having problems with our science database server. Currently we are not generating any new work to send out.
SETI broke
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
SETI broke
Only just noticed this as I don't do SETI
-
- KWSN team member
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:00 am
There seems to be an ongoing problem here, I'm starting to think that BOINCing and SETI is becoming a victim of it's own success, and the equipment is struggling to cope.
It seems that these system problems are becoming more regular and more serious, we have only just got Rosetta back up, just a SETI goes down.
Bit upsetting but I'm sure the guys are bevering away to repair the problems.
It seems that these system problems are becoming more regular and more serious, we have only just got Rosetta back up, just a SETI goes down.
Bit upsetting but I'm sure the guys are bevering away to repair the problems.
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
It's quite true that as member involvement with each BOINC project increases, so the bandwidth and hardware demands placed upon the project increase.Sir Cracked of the Mind wrote:There seems to be an ongoing problem here, I'm starting to think that BOINCing and SETI is becoming a victim of it's own success, and the equipment is struggling to cope.
It seems that these system problems are becoming more regular and more serious, we have only just got Rosetta back up, just a SETI goes down.
Bit upsetting but I'm sure the guys are beavering away to repair the problems.
This has been a sign of the "growing pain" for some of the "smaller" projects, such as PrimeGrid and Belgian Beer, where the bandwidth issue can become a major bottleneck.
Likewise, many projects are not commercially funded and hence rely on donations of either hardware from sponsors or money from numerous fund raising exercises.
So, in the end, BOINC may only survive if the projects can be funded in such a way as to keep in step with the demands placed on it, by it's members.
I had often wondered whether it might be a good idea for members to have to pay a small membership fee to each project they want to support, in order to help finance the project. Of course this could be open to mis-use (esp. if anyone can start-up a project, get loads of members signed up and then scoots off with the dosh !!).
But of course the problem here is that you won't get "fresh" members signed up - so maybe you pay a fee when you hit a particular threshold....? And then this entitles you access to a faster server (as paid for by the donations) with more available WU's on it....?
regards
Tim
Last edited by UBT - Timbo on Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KWSN team member
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:00 am
Reading the SETI message boards I have to agree about the project becoming a victim of its own success. Those hardworking blokes try and keep an aging set of kit working without any govt. cash and rely on donations of both money and equipment. They also have to hold down jobs of their own.
Were NASA told by the govt. to pull funding or was it a NASA decision? I can't remember
Were NASA told by the govt. to pull funding or was it a NASA decision? I can't remember

-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
Server Problems again plague Seti@home! 

-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Hi all,
Had just finished some WCG on one PC and so I thought...time to get some SETI WUs....
Now, there's a problem...I get:

regards
Tim
Had just finished some WCG on one PC and so I thought...time to get some SETI WUs....
Now, there's a problem...I get:
Checked the SETI server status page (which I eventually get to - is it slow?) and it looks fine...28/10/2007 18:58:52 - Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data)

regards
Tim
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
Was slow now back to normal speed. Might be a problem with the BOINCManager.
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_th ... rue#656264
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_th ... rue#656264
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Hi Micky,mickyb69 wrote:Hi tim , just checked mine and all getting is no work from server
Project servers may be temporarily down .
And yes its taking ages to access the site .
Add to that Http internal server error![]()
So its not just you m8 :lol:
Thanks for that.
I've just tried with my Q6600....and I got loads of 29 minute (to completion time) WUs....nice and short....that'll keep me busy for a while....

But 2 of my other PC's got nowt...

regards
Tim
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
-
- UBT Contributor
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:00 am
-
- KWSN team member
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:00 am
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Hi Terry,UBT - Terry wrote:Dunno if it's just me but every download fails on my rig at the mo
Terry
I had the same problem since last night and it wasn't a lot better this morning.
Got home tonight and everything is rosy...plenty of WU's downloaded and crunching is on-going...
Much have been a blip at SETI...
regards
Tim
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/tech_news.php
29 Oct 2007 21:17:47 UTC Technical News
There were minor minor hiccups over the weekend, mostly due to a concentrated bunch of noisy workunits being pushed through the pipeline. Other than that - no big server issues to mention.
Mines fine now its got rid of 30 second WU's
29 Oct 2007 21:17:47 UTC Technical News
There were minor minor hiccups over the weekend, mostly due to a concentrated bunch of noisy workunits being pushed through the pipeline. Other than that - no big server issues to mention.
Mines fine now its got rid of 30 second WU's

-
- UBT Contributor
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
Hope all Gauntleteers have reasonable caches. No work fron SETI at present.
It actually appears that the splitters are currently disabled.November 8, 2007
A big index build is stressing our science databases and the splitters are running very slowly. This has resulted in the project running out of work to send. We hope to see it clear by tomorrow morning.
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Might be an idea to change your Preferences (either in BOINC Manager "Advanced > Preferences > Network usage" or via your SETI account)mickyb69 wrote::crybaby: :homework: :dontknow: :shock: only got 12 hours work left on my naught 2.8![]()
![]()
![]()
Results ready to send 0 20m :crybaby: :shock:
Change the "Connect about every" to say 4 days
and change the "Additional Work buffer" to something like 4 to 6 days.
And if SETI has work available, you'll have a nice cache....once the Gauntlet is over, you can reduce this...but it might be an idea to keep it, as it has a benefit for every project you are attached to...!
regards
Tim
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
UBT - Timbo wrote:Might be an idea to change your Preferences (either in BOINC Manager "Advanced > Preferences > Network usage" or via your SETI account)mickyb69 wrote::crybaby: :homework: :dontknow: :shock: only got 12 hours work left on my naught 2.8![]()
![]()
![]()
Results ready to send 0 20m :crybaby: :shock:
Change the "Connect about every" to say 4 days
and change the "Additional Work buffer" to something like 4 to 6 days.
And if SETI has work available, you'll have a nice cache....once the Gauntlet is over, you can reduce this...but it might be an idea to keep it, as it has a benefit for every project you are attached to...!
regards
Tim
its just a strange problem i have on my naughty 2.8
all my other comps have 10 days worth and i've been through the settings and prefs with loads of people :lol: have a look at this

% of time BOINC client is running 99.9457 %
While BOINC running, % of time work is allowed 10.5263 %
grrrrrrrr running 24/7 on seti for 9 days now with all other projects suspended , no work and seti resource set on 77%

-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
You can also check available disk space limits as well...each SETI WU is around 330k....so it might be that with some HDD space taken up by the suspended projects, BOINC might be deciding you don't have enough available HDD space...!mickyb69 wrote:its just a strange problem i have on my naughty 2.8
all my other comps have 10 days worth and i've been through the settings and prefs with loads of people :lol: have a look at thisLast time contacted server 9 Nov 2007 11:26:10 UTC
% of time BOINC client is running 99.9457 %
While BOINC running, % of time work is allowed 10.5263 %
grrrrrrrr running 24/7 on seti for 9 days now with all other projects suspended , no work and seti resource set on 77%
:lol:
Do you get any comments in the "messages" tab, when you do an UPDATE on SETI?
regards
Tim
-
- UBT Contributor
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:00 am
This is the message from Seti's site.
November 8, 2007
A big index build is stressing our science databases and the splitters are running very slowly. This has resulted in the project running out of work to send. We hope to see it clear by tomorrow morning.
I'm having trouble getting work units too. Perhaps the Gauntlet has stretched seti to the limits.
I've got one left to process on this CPU. About 6 hours left of WU on another, about 10hours left on another.
oh no
. I guess everyone doing the Gauntlet will have the same trouble though.
November 8, 2007
A big index build is stressing our science databases and the splitters are running very slowly. This has resulted in the project running out of work to send. We hope to see it clear by tomorrow morning.
I'm having trouble getting work units too. Perhaps the Gauntlet has stretched seti to the limits.
I've got one left to process on this CPU. About 6 hours left of WU on another, about 10hours left on another.
oh no

-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz [x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 7]
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Professional Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 511.48 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Swap space 2016.64 MB
Total disk space 16.69 GB
Free Disk Space 14.38 GB
update gives me 0 wu's with no fault messages

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz [x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 7]
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Professional Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 511.48 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Swap space 2016.64 MB
Total disk space 16.69 GB
Free Disk Space 14.38 GB
update gives me 0 wu's with no fault messages

-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
-
- UBT Contributor
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:00 am
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Hi all,
I have plenty of work still to crunch....!
I set my connect days and work buffers fairly high, esp on my quad core...coz that just spits out completed WUs every couple of hours at max !!
Leaves me with about 200 WU still to complete...
Mind you - I'm on 24/7 on 3 PC's, so they just get downloaded, crunched uploaded and replaced...!
If you can update your prefs and resource share, via your SETI account, then when SETI has more work (once the splitters are back online), then you'll have work.
Meantime, you'll just have to re-enable another project so your crunching time is used to the max...!
regards
Tim
I have plenty of work still to crunch....!
I set my connect days and work buffers fairly high, esp on my quad core...coz that just spits out completed WUs every couple of hours at max !!
Leaves me with about 200 WU still to complete...

Mind you - I'm on 24/7 on 3 PC's, so they just get downloaded, crunched uploaded and replaced...!
If you can update your prefs and resource share, via your SETI account, then when SETI has more work (once the splitters are back online), then you'll have work.
Meantime, you'll just have to re-enable another project so your crunching time is used to the max...!
regards
Tim
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Yup - plenty of pending credits from here as well... 4,300 in fact....!melter65 wrote:I upped my cache prior to the Gauntlet starting and still have 55hrs worth of WUs left to crunch! :la:
Is everyone else getting large pending credits? I'm only a single CPU cruncher and I've got almost 1000 pending!
regards
Tim
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Musta bin a temporary glitch. It's running as are the splitters. Minimal if any work available as it's all getting grabbed as it apears.
{EDIT} 2 mins later, I've just received 8 WUs. so it's definitely runnung again {/EDIT}
However, if you look at Temujin's stats pages, combined graphs now seem to exclude SETI. Teach him to brag!
Hopefully things will sort themselves out.
{EDIT} 2 mins later, I've just received 8 WUs. so it's definitely runnung again {/EDIT}
However, if you look at Temujin's stats pages, combined graphs now seem to exclude SETI. Teach him to brag!
Hopefully things will sort themselves out.
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:00 am
yay i didn't run out
ta very much seti ..
I also now have 10 wu's for the naughty 2.8 ....6 more than the last 9 days ...what happened ???
Now all i have to do is win the lottery saturday night, Buy a DB7,install air con and 10 quad cores in the attic +1 each for the kids, pack me job in and ...................................................errrrrr beer and errrrrrrrrr some doritos (cheese),a time machine and errrrr some stuff :lol:

I also now have 10 wu's for the naughty 2.8 ....6 more than the last 9 days ...what happened ???

Now all i have to do is win the lottery saturday night, Buy a DB7,install air con and 10 quad cores in the attic +1 each for the kids, pack me job in and ...................................................errrrrr beer and errrrrrrrrr some doritos (cheese),a time machine and errrrr some stuff :lol:
I tried a few times shortly after the SETI site returned. My stats looked ok, but the graphs on clicking my overall total, both from the live and test pages showed no data from SETI from the past 28 days/daily/hourly figures.Temujin wrote:looks ok to me Rod
GOt me panicing a bit as I had an average of 0 credits for the 7day and 1 day totals. (JUst about 6 credits over the week from Pirates.
It seems ok now though. AS I said, a temporary glitch somewhere.
There's a number of people involved. All seem to have lost their seti UID in my CPID table, therefore the combined graphs don't include seti
It could be related to seti being down but I'm not sure why some work and some don't :?
edit
it seems that during the 18:00 update, I may have got an incomplete seti xml file.
Part of what it does is sets everybodies seti ID to 0 in my CPID table, then re-updates each row from the xml file, thereby catching any leavers.
Looks like I'll have to revisit that code
It could be related to seti being down but I'm not sure why some work and some don't :?
edit
it seems that during the 18:00 update, I may have got an incomplete seti xml file.
Part of what it does is sets everybodies seti ID to 0 in my CPID table, then re-updates each row from the xml file, thereby catching any leavers.
Looks like I'll have to revisit that code

-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
You can't blame me for this as I don't do SETI!
Is there a problem with the stats/XML output? Just had a quick look around some of the stats sites and none appear to show any results since yesterday afternoon. Nothing reported on the SETI site. Usual suspect servers seem to be running normally.
Just thought I'd mention it as it seems our output has dropped by half!
Our stats for example.
Is there a problem with the stats/XML output? Just had a quick look around some of the stats sites and none appear to show any results since yesterday afternoon. Nothing reported on the SETI site. Usual suspect servers seem to be running normally.
Just thought I'd mention it as it seems our output has dropped by half!
Our stats for example.
It looks as though it "might" be coming backUBT - Mikee wrote:You can't blame me for this as I don't do SETI!
Is there a problem with the stats/XML output? Just had a quick look around some of the stats sites and none appear to show any results since yesterday afternoon. Nothing reported on the SETI site. Usual suspect servers seem to be running normally.
Just thought I'd mention it as it seems our output has dropped by half!
Our stats for example.
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales