Receiving some larger packets
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:00 am
Receiving some larger packets
Hi,
Has anyone else been receiving some very large packets recently. Usually I can process a Einstein packet in 1.5hours, now it takes 18 hours. The nice thing is getting loads of credits for it. over 300 credits. :P
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/workunit.php?wuid=33355942
Has anyone else been receiving some very large packets recently. Usually I can process a Einstein packet in 1.5hours, now it takes 18 hours. The nice thing is getting loads of credits for it. over 300 credits. :P
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/workunit.php?wuid=33355942
Last edited by UBT - Knightlight on Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
-
- **20 Year Badge Holder for WCG/MCM**
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:00 am
- Location: South Bucks
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:00 am
Receiving some larger packets
Hi
25 Hours eh? Thats good - mine vary from 22hours for an 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ to 60hours on a Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz , and only getting 240 credits to boot.
Regards
G
25 Hours eh? Thats good - mine vary from 22hours for an 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ to 60hours on a Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz , and only getting 240 credits to boot.
Regards
G
-
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:00 am
Einstein are showing a big drop in daily credits in boingstats. A 30%+ drop over the last few days.
http://boincstats.com/stats/project_gra ... r=einstein
http://boincstats.com/stats/project_gra ... r=einstein
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:00 am
Yeah I've noticed a fall in average credits too.
On my slower PC its now taking 247 seconds per credit. The smaller work units took 194 second per credit. So certainly getting less credit for the amount of time spent. From 18.5 per hour to 14.5 per hour
So i thought perhaps that computer is under more work load doing something else, so looked at my faster PC, not dam fast but faster than my other. Its 147 seconds per credit on the larger work units, and 117 seconds per credit on the smaller work units. From 30.7 per hour to 24.5 per hour
I think most people are effected by this average per day falling, as there has been a bit of shuffling on the leader board. I've moved up 1 position. :D
I think I need more than my 2 computers to get my average any higher.
At least Einstein is giving more Credits than Seti. I'm doing that 50% of the time too.
On my slower PC its now taking 247 seconds per credit. The smaller work units took 194 second per credit. So certainly getting less credit for the amount of time spent. From 18.5 per hour to 14.5 per hour
So i thought perhaps that computer is under more work load doing something else, so looked at my faster PC, not dam fast but faster than my other. Its 147 seconds per credit on the larger work units, and 117 seconds per credit on the smaller work units. From 30.7 per hour to 24.5 per hour
I think most people are effected by this average per day falling, as there has been a bit of shuffling on the leader board. I've moved up 1 position. :D
I think I need more than my 2 computers to get my average any higher.
At least Einstein is giving more Credits than Seti. I'm doing that 50% of the time too.
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
They have adjusted the credit downwards as it appears it was set too high before, there is some stuff about it on their forums. As you run Seti check if there is an optimised client you can run such as chicken soup, see our optimised client thread, I find it makes a noticeable difference (I use the no graphics version).

-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:00 am
Thanks for the advice, one of my PC's was Intel Core 2, so have downloaded and installed the appropriate app. Will see how that goes.UBT-mark3346 wrote:They have adjusted the credit downwards as it appears it was set too high before, there is some stuff about it on their forums. As you run Seti check if there is an optimised client you can run such as chicken soup, see our optimised client thread, I find it makes a noticeable difference (I use the no graphics version).
However my other computer is:-
GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5310 @ 1.60GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 7] [fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx]
I have downloaded 'sse2-generic' for that one, shame there isn't a Xeon version, however i think the Xeon is slower than my Intel Core 2 anyway.
Thanks again.
Last edited by UBT - Knightlight on Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
you should at least be able to run the SSE2-Intel P4 version on your E5310, more likely be able to run the SSE3-Intel P4/PD version and I would guess that you'll even be able to run the SSSE3-Intel Core 2 version.Knightlight wrote:However my other computer is:-
GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5310 @ 1.60GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 7] [fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx]
I have downloaded 'sse2-generic' for that one, shame there is a Xeon version, however i think the Xeon is slower than my Intel Core 2 anyway.
Have you run the chicken test & benchmark tool?
that would not only tell you which apps would run but also which runs the fastest. Well worth a look.
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:00 am
-
- **20 Year Badge Holder for WCG/MCM**
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:00 am
- Location: South Bucks
-
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:00 am
Mmm this sounds interesting as my server chucked all the toys out of the pram this morning and I had to reinstall Boinc on another drive, transferred all the files over but it activated all the projects some how ?? (probably my fault) so it was downloading WU from almost all Projects. Any way the Einstein one says 80+ Hrs to complete!!
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:00 am
-
- **20 Year Badge Holder for WCG/MCM**
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:00 am
- Location: South Bucks
Probably just that they take so long that one WU uses up Einstein's "share" of your PC for a while. I had at least a week's hiatus between the previous WU and the one that has almost finished (99% after 92hours of crunching, so it had well better be worth it!!!)
The impossible we do today; miracles take a little longer


-
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:00 am
-
- KWSN team member
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:00 am
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
They have a 3 week deadline on the wu's so if the other one in the quorum has a slower machine and/or does not run 24/7 you have to wait that long (but if the other wu times out and they do not shorten the deadline for a reissue you are waiting up to 6 weeks), but you still get the credit.Sir Cracked of the Mind wrote:They seem to be running at about 24 hrs a pop, on mine, as for credit, it ain't that good at one point I had over 2000 points 'pending' it's just so frustrating.
I was thinking of ditching the project until they come up with something better, about crediting you with your work.

-
- KWSN team member
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:00 am
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
-
- **20 Year Badge Holder for WCG/MCM**
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:00 am
- Location: South Bucks
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
- Contact:
UBT - PennyQ wrote:Probably just that they take so long that one WU uses up Einstein's "share" of your PC for a while. I had at least a week's hiatus between the previous WU and the one that has almost finished (99% after 92hours of crunching, so it had well better be worth it!!!)
Thanks for the answers, I can see your point about PC share, PennyQ. I think I'll wait until I get another WU the natural way, Prof, instead of tinkering with my settings!UBT - The Prof.... wrote:Seems to do that sometimes. Had the same thing a while ago, then gives you another biggy to keep you happy.
You could try changing your preferences to give it more time if you want to run it more often. I have this @ 300% @ the moment.
