Quote from an Einstein thread
"In another thread I stated, “Hopefully Einstein doesn’t make the same mistake as Seti when they switch to S5”
Well, I must have been psychic!!!! In actual fact, Einstein has out done Seti with an additional 32% drop in granted credit.
SETI Enhanced
Pentium 4, 650 3.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 2 MB L2, 800 MHz FSB with Hyper Threading ON
5.3.12.tx36 BOINC client and Crunch3r’s Seti SSE3 V5.12 (average of 31 work units)
CPU time = 13,751.11 sec., Claimed credit = 14.38 CS/hr., Granted credit = 14.13 CS/hr.
Einstein New and Improved S5
Pentium 4, 650 3.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 2 MB L2, 800 MHz FSB with Hyper Threading ON
5.4.9 BOINC client and 4.02 app. (average of 2 short work units, 1.75 hrs each.)
CPU time = 6,326.31 sec., Claimed credit = 9.60 CS/hr., Granted credit = 9.60 CS/hr.
5.4.9 BOINC client and 4.02 app. (average of 2 long work units, 16.25 hrs each.)
CPU time = 58,479.20 sec., Claimed credit = 9.53 CS/hr., Granted credit = 9.50 CS/hr.
Is this some sinister diabolic plot on the part of those running DC projects to get us credit junkies to run out and buy bigger and faster computers? And/or buy the latest and slickest compiler and spent dozens of hours for nothing compiling faster science apps?
At the moment, both Seti and Einstein are on “No more work”. I’m just trying to decide if I should highlight the BOINC directory and hit DELETE.
Franz"
My first S5 WU took 10hrs 18min (37085sec) to complete and gave a credit of 119.79. That is only 280 credits a day when my RAC was over 660 on the old WU and has been over 330 on CPDN. It looks to me that Einstein is not the best place to earn credits, and our chase after Hungary is due to suffer as a result.
