Overtake AMD Users?

Team milestones, Badges from projects, congratulations to members regarding personal achievements (such as User Of The Day project awards, or reaching specific targets). Also topics about GRC (Gridcoin) rewards.
Post Reply
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Overtake AMD Users?

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

According to my calculations we should overtake them VERY soon. I've been calculating the overtake for the last week or so, and the passing time is fast approaching.

Calculation results:
Using Project RAC pass in 3.19 days
Using overtake formula pass in 7.09 days
Using BOINCstats RAC pass in 10.77 days

Average of all three: 7.01 days

But project RAC is not very accurate as we all know due to some RACs not decaying so an average of the other two, with the more accurate BOINCstats RAC: pass in 8.93 days (probably the most accurate estimate)
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Overtake AMD Users?

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

A little update:

Calculation results:
Using Project RAC pass in 1.35 days
Using overtake formula pass in 1.82 days
Using BOINCstats RAC pass in 4.30 days

Average of all three: 2.49 days

More accurate average (not including project RAC): pass in 3.06 days (probably the most accurate estimate)

Could be sooner than passing SwissTeam.NET!  8)
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Overtake AMD Users?

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

Another daily update:

Calculation results:
Using Project RAC pass in 1.01 days
Using overtake formula pass in 2.16 days
Using BOINCstats RAC pass in 3.43 days

Average of all three: 2.20 days

Average not including project RAC: pass in 2.79 days (probably the most accurate estimate)

Closer and closer!  8)
UBT - JohnR
Posts: 391
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:00 am

Post by UBT - JohnR »

Bootiful  graph
Image  :lol:

Lets hope it is even better next week, its been a long time coming.

(Edited by Timbo to show the actual graph - sorry John  :oops: !!)
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Overtake AMD Users?

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

Daily update:

Calculation results:
Using Project RAC pass in 0.77 days
Using overtake formula pass in 1.82 days
Using BOINCstats RAC pass in 2.70 days

Average of all three: 1.76 days

Average not including project RAC: pass in 2.26 days (probably the most accurate estimate)

We can smell them now!
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Overtake AMD Users?

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

Daily update:

Calculation results:
Using Project RAC pass in 0.76 days
Using overtake formula pass in 2.16 days
Using BOINCstats RAC pass in 2.70 days

Average of all three: 1.88 days

Average not including project RAC: pass in 2.43 days (probably the most accurate estimate)

AMD had a good day with almost identical daily credit to us so not much change from yesterday's estimate.
UBT - JohnR
Posts: 391
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:00 am

Post by UBT - JohnR »

At 1.00am BOINCstats show us ahead of SwissTeam.NET by 1000 credits.
phucco
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:00 am

Post by phucco »

yup! I don't know which we are going with,
http://www.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_t ... pr=bo&st=0
or
http://chase.ukboincteam.com/
but I feel a celebration coming on in any case!
UBT - Timbo
UBT Forum Admin
Posts: 9688
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
Location: NW Midlands
Contact:

Post by UBT - Timbo »

phucco wrote:yup! I don't know which we are going with,
http://www.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_t ... pr=bo&st=0
or
http://chase.ukboincteam.com/
but I feel a celebration coming on in any case!
It usually takes about a day or two for the 3rd party stats sites to show us clear of any team we've passed, simply because the stats sites are using the XML's exported from each project (which are output at different times each day) which they then "collate" to generate the stats, which takes time.

And if not ALL the XML's are collated, then the stats sites will be under-quoting the actual totals, which seems to be where we're at with BOINC stats - right now, they show us with 52,956,992 credits and yet we had 53,033,483.78 credits as of 12 noon yesterday !!

As such, 3rd party stats sites only provide a "snapshot" based on whatever info they can get, which might not be 100%.

The UBT stats are "real time" as they are collected directly from the projects themselves and hence are independant of the XML's.

So our stats page is more up to date and usually is more accurate.

And as of 9am today, we're still behind SwissTeam.NET by approx 78,000 credits, and based on our RAC, we should pass them by sometime tomorrow.

regards

Tim
phucco
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:00 am

Post by phucco »

Gotcha! Thanks for clearing that up Tim. I'll break out the party hats tmr then  :D
:occasion9:  :occasion9:  :occasion9:
UBT - Timbo
UBT Forum Admin
Posts: 9688
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
Location: NW Midlands
Contact:

Post by UBT - Timbo »

phucco wrote:Gotcha! Thanks for clearing that up Tim. I'll break out the party hats tmr then  :D
:occasion9:  :occasion9:  :occasion9:
Yup - you might have to break out 2 sets of party hats, as we might just squeeze past AMD Users tomorrow as well....!

regards,

Tim
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Overtake AMD Users?

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

Daily update:

Calculation results:
Using Project RAC pass in 0.40 days
Using overtake formula pass in 1.20 days
Using BOINCstats RAC pass in 1.50 days

Average of all three: 1.03 days

Average not including project RAC: pass in 1.35days (probably the most accurate estimate)

Only 22,000 behind according to BOINCstats. It could be tomorrow! If we have a good day/they have a bad day or if a climate cruncher with a few credits joins!

World highest position of 33 beckons  8)
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

I think this thread has jinxed us  :lol: A member with 115,000 on CPDN joined them to muck up my calculations!

And once we do get past them we should stay ahead, they'll miss out on any Core 2 Duos and Quads ;)
UBT-mark3346
Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
Posts: 7515
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
Contact:

Post by UBT-mark3346 »

DJH@GB-Ro wrote: And once we do get past them we should stay ahead, they'll miss out on any Core 2 Duos and Quads ;)
?

Don't need to be exclusive AMD to join them.
Image
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

UBT-mark3346 wrote:Don't need to be exclusive AMD to join them.
But I doubt many intel users would want to  :wink:
UBT-mark3346
Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
Posts: 7515
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
Contact:

Post by UBT-mark3346 »

I was thinking of people with AMD and Intel rather than Intel alone (I cannot be the only cruncher with both). My machines are evenly split between the two types but if I were get a tie breaker it would be another AMD as they out-perform the Intels on most Boinc projects I run :lol:
Image
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

UBT-mark3346 wrote:I was thinking of people with AMD and Intel rather than Intel alone (I cannot be the only cruncher with both). My machines are evenly split between the two types but if I were get a tie breaker it would be another AMD as they out-perform the Intels on most Boinc projects I run :lol:
I take it you don't have Core 2 Duos or Quads? ;)
UBT-mark3346
Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
Posts: 7515
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 1:00 am
Contact:

Post by UBT-mark3346 »

DJH@GB-Ro wrote:I take it you don't have Core 2 Duos or Quads? ;)
No just comparing at roughly equal cost an Intel Pentium D CPU 3.40GHz, 2Gb ram 270 Gb disk and an AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+ with same size ram and disk, AMD gets more credit per WU.   Same with the slower machines my Intel Pentium D CPU 2.80GHz  and AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+ again both with 2Gb ram ( although only 180 Gb disk on the Intel). The AMD's do not get as hot or make as much noise as the Intel's either although if a good Intel was really cheap I would consider it but would have to think about the cost of getting air con :lol:
Image
UBT - JohnR
Posts: 391
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:00 am

Post by UBT - JohnR »

YES YES YES

BOINCstats show us above AMD Users. OK for the next few days we may swap places but the signs are good to keep the 33rd place for a while

http://boincstats.com/stats/boinc_team_ ... pr=bo&st=0

BUT Einstein at Work in 38th place have just done 3 days at 650,000 a day, and will soon catch up (about 7 days?) at that rate :cry:
DJH@GB-Ro
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Overtake AMD Users?

Post by DJH@GB-Ro »

DJH@GB-Ro wrote:Pass in 8.93 days (probably the most accurate estimate)
Original estimate turned out to be pretty accurate  8)
Post Reply