Millionaires League
Re: Millionaires League
Finally had a bit of free time to automate this (mainly due to work winding down in anticipation of some sort of forthcoming holiday? )
Top twenty according to Boincstats which includes new and retired projects:
=1 Temujin 30
=1 Woodles 30
3 Traviss 23
=4 Nicksphone 16
=4 UBT - Timbo 16
=4 ncoded.com 16
7 Keith 15
8 UBT - JohnR 13
=9 UBT-Timby 11
=9 LupusUK 11
=9 UBT - mickyb69 11
=9 UBT-McTooth 11
13 Zydor 10
=14 JonS 9
=14 Greenways Court 9
=14 GalaxyIce 9
=17 Alan Jordan 8
=17 Darren 8
=17 UBT - Rick Horn 8
=17 UBT - Mikeejones 8
I've made a couple of assumptions on this. ChrisCambridge and ncoded are the same person and Darren and DazzaUk are the same person.
Doesn't show any increases over the last table as that was based on a completely different set of data.
Mark
(Slipped up a little with 14/15th place - corrected)
Top twenty according to Boincstats which includes new and retired projects:
=1 Temujin 30
=1 Woodles 30
3 Traviss 23
=4 Nicksphone 16
=4 UBT - Timbo 16
=4 ncoded.com 16
7 Keith 15
8 UBT - JohnR 13
=9 UBT-Timby 11
=9 LupusUK 11
=9 UBT - mickyb69 11
=9 UBT-McTooth 11
13 Zydor 10
=14 JonS 9
=14 Greenways Court 9
=14 GalaxyIce 9
=17 Alan Jordan 8
=17 Darren 8
=17 UBT - Rick Horn 8
=17 UBT - Mikeejones 8
I've made a couple of assumptions on this. ChrisCambridge and ncoded are the same person and Darren and DazzaUk are the same person.
Doesn't show any increases over the last table as that was based on a completely different set of data.
Mark
(Slipped up a little with 14/15th place - corrected)
Last edited by Woodles on Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9679
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Re: Millionaires League
Hi Mark
Excellent work !!
The one issue with Temujins/Johns website is that it isn't up to date and hence some newer projects are not included and so any millionaire members (of these newer projects) are not taken into account on the website "Millionaires" page.
Your automated stats are therefore much more accurate and give better recognition to those members who have reached such heights !
Update: I've checked and I think Darren/Dazza/DazzaUK are one and the same, at least as far as ubtstats are concerned:
http://ubtstats.co.uk/ubt/ubt_graph.php ... me=DazzaUK
regards and thanks
Tim
Excellent work !!
The one issue with Temujins/Johns website is that it isn't up to date and hence some newer projects are not included and so any millionaire members (of these newer projects) are not taken into account on the website "Millionaires" page.
Your automated stats are therefore much more accurate and give better recognition to those members who have reached such heights !
Update: I've checked and I think Darren/Dazza/DazzaUK are one and the same, at least as far as ubtstats are concerned:
http://ubtstats.co.uk/ubt/ubt_graph.php ... me=DazzaUK
regards and thanks
Tim
Re: Millionaires League
10 millionchriscambridge wrote:Would would be interesting if this were expanded (given note below):
10 Million
100 Million
1 Billion
--
1 Temujin 11
2 Woodles 10
3 UBT - JohnR 9
4 UBT-McTooth 8
5 Zydor 7
=6 Traviss 6
=6 UBT - mickyb69 6
=6 UBT - Timbo 6
=9 ncoded.com 5
=9 Joshrandom 5
=11 martyn bamber 4
=11 GalaxyIce 4
=11 UBT-Timby 4
=11 LupusUK 4
=11 Jeff Bulmer 4
=11 Eric 4
=11 Nicksphone 4
=11 Keith 4
=19 ty2011k 3
=19 rimmer66 3
=19 Greenways Court 3
=19 Niallos 3
=19 Stuey77 3
=19 UBT - Rick Horn 3
=19 Doug Benger 3
=19 Madas91 3
=19 owlz.net 3
=19 ukjohnd 3
=19 david 3
=19 Steven Pinder 3
100 million
=1 Temujin 6
=1 Zydor 6
3 UBT - JohnR 5
=4 UBT-McTooth 4
=4 Woodles 4
=6 Eric 3
=6 Joshrandom 3
=6 UBT - Timbo 3
=9 Bambi_72 2
=9 TroubledBunny 2
=9 UBT - mickyb69 2
=9 Jeff Bulmer 2
=9 Nicksphone 2
=9 Steven Pinder 2
=9 ncoded.com 2
=9 Keith 2
=9 Hogey 2
=18 Mark Evemy 1
=18 UBT - Terry 1
=18 jamesfox 1
=18 Paul Griffin 1
=18 UBT - NaRyan 1
=18 Kevin 1
=18 Madas91 1
=18 GalaxyIce 1
=18 owlz.net 1
=18 SIN-NOMBRE 1
=18 Fred Bayliss 1
=18 LupusUK 1
=18 meddy2065 1
1 billion
=1 Hogey 2
=1 Woodles 2
=3 UBT - Timbo 1
=3 Joshrandom 1
=3 Richard Whitehurst 1
=3 Keith 1
=3 UBT - Mikeejones 1
=3 Temujin 1
=3 Keith 1
=3 Tackleway 1
=3 GPUGRID Role account 1
There may be some accounts missing off the 10 million and 100 million tables as I only save the top thirty accounts. Also there's two 'Keith's in the billions table. If they're the same account then they should be equal first as well.
Mark
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
Re: Millionaires League
Hi
Well that's disappointing! Only listed twice in across both lists - must try harder!
Do you think if I swapped over to Collatz I might get a 100 million eventually? What could tempt me to do that?
Mike
Well that's disappointing! Only listed twice in across both lists - must try harder!
Do you think if I swapped over to Collatz I might get a 100 million eventually? What could tempt me to do that?
Mike
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9679
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Re: Millionaires League
Hi MarkWoodles wrote:Also there's two 'Keith's in the billions table. If they're the same account then they should be equal first as well.
Mark
The two "Keiths" are indeed different - one is aka "hgblade" and the second is aka "Mudbankkeith".
So, your table is correct as it stands.
regards
Tim
Re: Millionaires League
Time to update this.
Code: Select all
1 million 10 million 100 million 1 billion
1 Woodles 32 (+2) =1 Temujin 10 1 Zydor 6 =1 Hogey 2
2 Temujin 30 =1 Woodles 10 =2 UBT - JohnR 5 =1 Woodles 2
3 Traviss 23 3 UBT - JohnR 9 =2 Temujin 5 =3 UBT - Timbo 1
4 UBT - Timbo 19 (+3) 4 UBT-McTooth 8 =4 UBT-McTooth 4 =3 Joshrandom 1
5 Nicksphone 16 5 Zydor 7 =4 Woodles 4 =3 Richard Whitehurst 1
6 Keith 15 =6 Traviss 6 =6 Eric 3 =3 Keith 1
7 UBT - JohnR 13 =6 UBT - mickyb69 6 =6 Joshrandom 3 =3 UBT - Mikeejones 1
8 ChrisCambridge 12 (-4) =6 ChrisCambridge 6 (+1) =6 UBT - Timbo 3 =3 Temujin 1
=9 UBT-Timby 11 =6 UBT - Timbo 6 =9 Bambi_72 2 =3 Keith 1
=9 LupusUK 11 =10 UBT - Mikeejones 5 (+2) =9 TroubledBunny 2 =3 Tackleway 1
=9 UBT - mickyb69 11 =10 Joshrandom 5 =9 UBT - mickyb69 2 =3 GPUGRID Role account 1
=9 UBT-McTooth 11 =12 martyn bamber 4 =9 Jeff Bulmer 2
=13 Alan Jordan 10 (+2) =12 GalaxyIce 4 =9 Nicksphone 2
=13 JonS 10 (+1) =12 UBT-Timby 4 =9 Steven Pinder 2
=13 Greenways Court 10 (+1) =12 LupusUK 4 =9 ChrisCambridge 2
=13 Zydor 10 =12 Eric 4 =9 Keith 2
=13 UBT - Mikeejones 10 (+2) =12 Jeff Bulmer 4 =9 Hogey 2
18 GalaxyIce 9 =12 Nicksphone 4 =18 Mark Evemy 1
=19 Darren 8 =12 Keith 4 =18 Hugo Gilet 1 (+1)
=19 UBT - Rick Horn 8 =20 UBT - PHÆ3 =18 UBT - Terry 1
=20 ty2011k 3 =18 jamesfox 1
=20 JonS 3 (+1) =18 UBT - NaRyan 1
=20 Greenways Court 3 =18 Paul Griffin 1
=20 rimmer66 3 =18 Kevin 1
=20 fellie 3 (+1) =18 UBT - wkdwill 1 (+1)
=20 Stuey77 3 =18 Madas91 1
=20 UBT - Rick Horn 3 =18 GalaxyIce 1
=20 Niallos 3 =18 owlz.net 1
=20 Doug Benger 3 =18 Fred Bayliss 1
=20 Madas91 3 =18 SIN-NOMBRE 1
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
Re: Millionaires League
Hi
After several months of on/off trying I've now got another into the 10 million list (Milkyway) - woo hoo! Now getting into the 100 million list is gonna be a bit tricky - the closest is Collatz at 58 million but that runs a bit hot in the current ambient temperature, next is Moo! at 35.5 million which will take a while but runs cooler... ho hum...
Mike
After several months of on/off trying I've now got another into the 10 million list (Milkyway) - woo hoo! Now getting into the 100 million list is gonna be a bit tricky - the closest is Collatz at 58 million but that runs a bit hot in the current ambient temperature, next is Moo! at 35.5 million which will take a while but runs cooler... ho hum...
Mike
-
- Active UBT Contributor 1+ yr
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:56 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Millionaires League
I think adding two extra groups, one at 250 million and one at 500 million would be pretty useful, as its a pretty long/impossible jump from 100 million to 1 billion! I think that would make it far more exclusive, as I guess would if retired projects were removed
Re: Millionaires League
OK, updated with the new groups, retired projects still included as the work was put in by the user to get the credits originally.
Lists extended to include everyone at the final level (that reached by the 30th team member)
For those curious, the order of members with an equal number of values is the reverse of their total credits. Not intentional, that's just the way it worked out. I may re-write the code to reverse the order as that seems fairer.
Mark
Lists extended to include everyone at the final level (that reached by the 30th team member)
For those curious, the order of members with an equal number of values is the reverse of their total credits. Not intentional, that's just the way it worked out. I may re-write the code to reverse the order as that seems fairer.
Mark
Re: Millionaires League
1 Millionaires
Mark
Code: Select all
1 Woodles 35 (+3)
2 Temujin 30
3 UBT - Timbo 24 (+5 and a place)
4 Traviss 23
5 Nicksphone 16
6 Keith 15
= 7 UBT - JohnR 13
= 7 chriscambridge 13 (+1)
= 9 LupusUK 12 (+1 and a place)
= 9 UBT - Mikeejones 12 (+2 and four places!)
=11 Alan Jordan 11 (+1 and two places)
=11 JonS 11 (+1 and two places)
=11 UBT-Timby 11
=11 UBT - mickyb69 11
=11 UBT-McTooth 11
=16 Greenways Court 10
=16 Zydor 10
18 GalaxyIce 9
=19 jbest 8
=19 Darren 8
=19 UBT - Rick Horn 8
=19 rimmer66 8
=23 rwremote 7
=23 ANCHULA-MARK 7
=23 Marcus Cooper 7
=23 UBT - Chris Suddick 7
=23 MichaelMaggs 7
=23 Chrisf 7
=23 Neil 7
=23 Stuey77 7
=23 UBT - NaRyan 7
=23 Jeff Bulmer 7
=23 Steven Pinder 7
=23 Hogey 7
=23 Joshrandom 7
Re: Millionaires League
10 Millionaires
Mark
Code: Select all
1 Woodles 17 (+7)
2 Temujin 10
3 UBT - JohnR 9
4 UBT-McTooth 8
= 5 Zydor 7
= 5 chriscambridge 7 (+1 and a place)
= 7 Traviss 6
= 7 UBT - mickyb69 6
= 7 UBT - Mikeejones 6 (+1 and three places)
= 7 UBT - Timbo 6
=11 rimmer66 5 (+2 and nine places!)
=11 LupusUK 5 (+1 and a place)
=11 Joshrandom 5
=14 JonS 4 (+1 and six places!)
=14 martyn bamber 4
=14 GalaxyIce 4
=14 UBT-Timby 4
=14 ukjohnd 4 (New entry)
=14 Eric 4
=14 Nicksphone 4
=14 Jeff Bulmer 4
=14 Keith 4
=23 UBT - PHÖNÍX 3
=23 Greenways Court 3
=23 ty2011k 3 (New entry)
=23 Matt 3
=23 Stuey77 3
=23 UBT - Rick Horn 3
=23 fellie 3
=23 Niallos 3
=23 Doug Benger 3
=23 Madas91 3
=23 owlz.net 3 (New entry)
=23 david 3 (New entry)
=23 Steven Pinder 3 (New entry)
=23 Tackleway 3 (New entry)
=23 Richard Whitehurst 3 (New entry)
Re: Millionaires League
100 Millionaires
Mark
Code: Select all
1 Zydor 6
= 2 UBT - JohnR 5
= 2 Temujin 5
= 4 UBT-McTooth 4
= 4 Woodles 4
= 6 Eric 3
= 6 Joshrandom 3
= 6 UBT - Timbo 3
= 9 Bambi_72 2
= 9 TroubledBunny 2
= 9 UBT - mickyb69 2
= 9 Nicksphone 2
= 9 Jeff Bulmer 2
= 9 Steven Pinder 2
= 9 chriscambridge 2
= 9 Keith 2
= 9 Hogey 2
=18 UBT - Terry 1
=18 Mark Evemy 1
=18 jamesfox 1
=18 Chris 1
=18 UBT - NaRyan 1
=18 Hugo Gilet 1
=18 Paul Griffin 1
=18 UBT - wkdwill 1
=18 Madas91 1
=18 GalaxyIce 1
=18 owlz.net 1
=18 Fred Bayliss 1
=18 Kevin 1
=18 SIN-NOMBRE 1
=18 GoodFodder 1
=18 LupusUK 1
=18 Homefarm 1
=18 david 1
=18 meddy2065 1
=18 John Sheridan 1
=18 ukjohnd 1
=18 GPUGRID Role account 1
=18 Tackleway 1
=18 UBT - Mikeejones 1
=18 Keith 1
=18 Richard Whitehurst 1
Re: Millionaires League
250 Millionaires
Mark
Code: Select all
1 Temujin 5
= 2 Zydor 3
= 2 Woodles 3
= 4 Eric 2
= 4 Jeff Bulmer 2
= 4 UBT-McTooth 2
= 4 Steven Pinder 2
= 4 UBT - JohnR 2
= 4 chriscambridge 2
= 4 Keith 2
= 4 Hogey 2
= 4 Joshrandom 2
= 4 UBT - Timbo 2
=14 Fred Bayliss 1
=14 SIN-NOMBRE 1
=14 GoodFodder 1
=14 Homefarm 1
=14 david 1
=14 TroubledBunny 1
=14 meddy2065 1
=14 UBT - mickyb69 1
=14 John Sheridan 1
=14 ukjohnd 1
=14 Nicksphone 1
=14 GPUGRID Role account 1
=14 Tackleway 1
=14 UBT - Mikeejones 1
=14 Keith 1
=14 Richard Whitehurst 1
Re: Millionaires League
500 Millionaires
Mark
Code: Select all
1 Woodles 3
=2 Steven Pinder 2
=2 Zydor 2
=2 UBT - JohnR 2
=2 chriscambridge 2
=2 Hogey 2
=7 meddy2065 1
=7 John Sheridan 1
=7 ukjohnd 1
=7 Eric 1
=7 Nicksphone 1
=7 Jeff Bulmer 1
=7 GPUGRID Role account 1
=7 UBT-McTooth 1
=7 Tackleway 1
=7 Keith 1
=7 Temujin 1
=7 UBT - Mikeejones 1
=7 Keith 1
=7 Richard Whitehurst 1
=7 Joshrandom 1
=7 UBT - Timbo 1
Re: Millionaires League
And finally, Billionaires
Mark
Code: Select all
=1 Hogey 2
=1 Woodles 2
=3 GPUGRID Role account 1
=3 Tackleway 1
=3 UBT - JohnR 1 (New entry)
=3 chriscambridge 1 (New entry)
=3 Keith 1
=3 Temujin 1
=3 UBT - Mikeejones 1
=3 Keith 1
=3 Richard Whitehurst 1
=3 Joshrandom 1
=3 UBT - Timbo 1
Re: Millionaires League
Mikee should be pleased, he's managed to bag a spot on all six lists!
Mark
Mark
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
Re: Millionaires League
Hi
Currently in Spain, lost case,stolen phone, stolen tablet but at least I got this target I was aiming for months ago! So not all bad!
Mike
Currently in Spain, lost case,stolen phone, stolen tablet but at least I got this target I was aiming for months ago! So not all bad!
Mike
-
- Active UBT Contributor 1+ yr
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:56 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Millionaires League
Sorry to hear that Mike, must be soo frustrating.
Good work Mark.. Yeah I guess that makes sense about retired projects.
Now we just need some total indicator so we can quickly see how well one is doing..
Perhaps:
1 point for 1 million,
10 points for 10 million
100 points for 100 million
250 points for 250 million
500 points for 500 million
1000 points for 1 billion
Obviously 1 point per million.
Using you and Temujin as an example:
Woodles: 35+170+400+750+1500+2000
4,855 points
Temujin: 30+100+500+2500+500+1000
4,630 points
I guess as you have the credit extraction automated, you could spin this out pretty easily to generate a "UBT Millionaires League (summation/totals) Table"?
Good work Mark.. Yeah I guess that makes sense about retired projects.
Now we just need some total indicator so we can quickly see how well one is doing..
Perhaps:
1 point for 1 million,
10 points for 10 million
100 points for 100 million
250 points for 250 million
500 points for 500 million
1000 points for 1 billion
Obviously 1 point per million.
Using you and Temujin as an example:
Woodles: 35+170+400+750+1500+2000
4,855 points
Temujin: 30+100+500+2500+500+1000
4,630 points
I guess as you have the credit extraction automated, you could spin this out pretty easily to generate a "UBT Millionaires League (summation/totals) Table"?
Re: Millionaires League
Hi Mikee,UBT - Mikee wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 5:52 pm Hi
Currently in Spain, lost case,stolen phone, stolen tablet but at least I got this target I was aiming for months ago! So not all bad!
Mike
So long as you remember what's important!
(Sorry to hear about your experiences)
Mark
Re: Millionaires League
Hi Chris,
That wouldn't be a problem but it would be very biased towards the Billionaires.
At present, the totals are for each project with the threshold points or more. Using your numbers, a project with more than 1 million but less than ten million would get a single point but a project with more than a billion would get
1000 (for being over a billion)
+ 500 (for being over 500 million)
+ 250 (for being over 250 million)
+ 100 (for being over 100 million)
+ 10 (for being over 10 million)
+ 1 (for being over 1 million)
A total of 1,861 points.
At the other end of the range, a single project with 10,000,001 credits would score more than ten projects with 9,999,999 credits (11 points to 10)
Personally, I think that getting ten projects over the one million mark is a harder achievement than getting one project to over ten million. Diversity over persistence Besides, some projects are easy to get over one million (Collatz - GPU, 80+ credits a second, 3.5 hours for a million) others are a lot more difficult (CAS - CPU, 0.018 credits a second, 1.75 YEARS for a million) This is similar to the age old problem of comparing projects on the Boinc credit system, one projects credit isn't the same as another projects credit.
I might see about eliminating projects from all but their highest group or maybe some sort of league table sorted by number of billions, then 500 millions, then 250 millions etc.
Mark
That wouldn't be a problem but it would be very biased towards the Billionaires.
At present, the totals are for each project with the threshold points or more. Using your numbers, a project with more than 1 million but less than ten million would get a single point but a project with more than a billion would get
1000 (for being over a billion)
+ 500 (for being over 500 million)
+ 250 (for being over 250 million)
+ 100 (for being over 100 million)
+ 10 (for being over 10 million)
+ 1 (for being over 1 million)
A total of 1,861 points.
At the other end of the range, a single project with 10,000,001 credits would score more than ten projects with 9,999,999 credits (11 points to 10)
Personally, I think that getting ten projects over the one million mark is a harder achievement than getting one project to over ten million. Diversity over persistence Besides, some projects are easy to get over one million (Collatz - GPU, 80+ credits a second, 3.5 hours for a million) others are a lot more difficult (CAS - CPU, 0.018 credits a second, 1.75 YEARS for a million) This is similar to the age old problem of comparing projects on the Boinc credit system, one projects credit isn't the same as another projects credit.
I might see about eliminating projects from all but their highest group or maybe some sort of league table sorted by number of billions, then 500 millions, then 250 millions etc.
Mark
-
- UBT Forum Admin
- Posts: 9679
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: NW Midlands
- Contact:
Re: Millionaires League
HI MikeUBT - Mikee wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 5:52 pm Hi
Currently in Spain, lost case,stolen phone, stolen tablet but at least I got this target I was aiming for months ago! So not all bad!
Mike
Sorry to hear that - hope it's all insured and you've had a chance to cancel anything important (like phone contract etc).
I don't suppose you set up any 'tracking apps' on either phone or tablet...? At least they can be remotely locked and/or tracked?
Hope you have an (otherwise) nice time in Spain.
regards
Tim
-
- Marvin the Dalek
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: North Wales
Re: Millionaires League
HiUBT - Timbo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:55 pmHI MikeUBT - Mikee wrote: ↑Wed Sep 05, 2018 5:52 pm Hi
Currently in Spain, lost case,stolen phone, stolen tablet but at least I got this target I was aiming for months ago! So not all bad!
Mike
Sorry to hear that - hope it's all insured and you've had a chance to cancel anything important (like phone contract etc).
I don't suppose you set up any 'tracking apps' on either phone or tablet...? At least they can be remotely locked and/or tracked?
Hope you have an (otherwise) nice time in Spain.
regards
Tim
Case turned up this morning, phone has been blacklisted. Trying to find a way to track tablet but have limited info as that info is at home (hopefully). Got serial number from ee so that's a start. Watching thunderstorm now!
Off topic but how hum
Mike
-
- Active UBT Contributor 1+ yr
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:56 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Millionaires League
Oh not as simple as I first thought then.. It was just an idea, nothing that important really.
Re: Millionaires League
Had a quick go and created an overall table based on IOC rules (billions first, then 500 millions etc - similar to what Chris suggested)
So a sort of league table.
Personally I'm not sure that GoodFodder with one project scoring more than 250 million (GPUGrid) should be better placed than say Traviss who has 23 projects over the one million mark but doesn't even make the list.
Still, I suppose it does give an idea of what a member needs to improve to move up a position (no point in pushing for that 500 million project if a new, 1,000,000 project will suffice)
I'm open to suggestions for a better overall scoring method.
Mark
Code: Select all
1000 500 250 100 10 Millions
Woodles 2 3 3 4 17 35
Hogey 2 2 2 2 2 7
UBT - JohnR 1 2 2 5 9 13
ncoded.com 1 2 2 2 7 13
Temujin 1 1 5 5 10 30
UBT - Timbo 1 1 2 3 6 24
Joshrandom 1 1 2 3 5 7
Keith 1 1 2 2 4 15
UBT - Mikeejones 1 1 1 1 6 12
Tackleway 1 1 1 1 3 6
Richard Whitehurst 1 1 1 1 3 3
Keith 1 1 1 1 2 4
GPUGRID Role account 1 1 1 1 1 1
Zydor 0 2 3 6 7 10
Steven Pinder 0 2 2 2 3 7
UBT-McTooth 0 1 2 4 8 11
Eric 0 1 2 3 4 5
Jeff Bulmer 0 1 2 2 4 7
Nicksphone 0 1 1 2 4 16
ukjohnd 0 1 1 1 4 6
John Sheridan 0 1 1 1 2 3
meddy2065 0 1 1 1 1 2
UBT - mickyb69 0 0 1 2 6 11
TroubledBunny 0 0 1 2 2 3
david 0 0 1 1 3 5
Homefarm 0 0 1 1 2 4
SIN-NOMBRE 0 0 1 1 2 3
Fred Bayliss 0 0 1 1 1 2
GoodFodder 0 0 1 1 1 1
Bambi_72 0 0 0 2 2 3
Personally I'm not sure that GoodFodder with one project scoring more than 250 million (GPUGrid) should be better placed than say Traviss who has 23 projects over the one million mark but doesn't even make the list.
Still, I suppose it does give an idea of what a member needs to improve to move up a position (no point in pushing for that 500 million project if a new, 1,000,000 project will suffice)
I'm open to suggestions for a better overall scoring method.
Mark
-
- Active UBT Contributor 1+ yr
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:56 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Millionaires League
Its actually quite a difficult problem not only for the frequency issue you mentioned of the lower scored number of projects over the higher ones, but also if you compare GPU projects to CPU based one. Should 100 million on Collatz be equally weighted to say 100 million on WorldCommunityGrid, when the former can be done in hours/days/weeks yet the latter would/could take many years?
Also, those that got a billion off BU and now have a billion from Collatz, are pretty much are impossible to catch now as getting a billion from GPUGrid, PrimeGrid or Moo! is no mean feat in terms of money/time/hardware.
Just out of interest, given the point above, If someone gets 10 billion on Collatz, will a new group be added?
However saying all this, personally I like this league table as it shows a quick comparison between crunchers and projects, without getting to bogged down in weightings/frequencies/fairness/etc.
One thing that maybe should be looked at is multiple accounts. Imagine someone create a few accounts and they all get connected, and then the person did a billion from Collatz on each account?
Personally I would be happy if the league only took one account for stats; and I am guessing that perhaps I would have most to lose in terms of this new rule change, however it does seem the right thing to do?
Also, those that got a billion off BU and now have a billion from Collatz, are pretty much are impossible to catch now as getting a billion from GPUGrid, PrimeGrid or Moo! is no mean feat in terms of money/time/hardware.
Just out of interest, given the point above, If someone gets 10 billion on Collatz, will a new group be added?
However saying all this, personally I like this league table as it shows a quick comparison between crunchers and projects, without getting to bogged down in weightings/frequencies/fairness/etc.
One thing that maybe should be looked at is multiple accounts. Imagine someone create a few accounts and they all get connected, and then the person did a billion from Collatz on each account?
Personally I would be happy if the league only took one account for stats; and I am guessing that perhaps I would have most to lose in terms of this new rule change, however it does seem the right thing to do?
Re: Millionaires League
Hi Chris,
True and I don't know what the solution is.
Split into GPU and CPU projects? ....But some projects have/had both and there's no telling what the split is/was.
Eliminate retired projects? ... Penalises those that were more active in the past and not so much now. Although I would be prepared to eliminate BU as that was a bit of an outlier and only supported by 35 team members who scored lots of points and skew the results)
The other option is going back to separate leagues for each division. In that case, Traviss is third in the individual millions league and gets a mention for his persistence.
There are five team members already with more than 10 billion, three with more than 100 billion and one with more than 250 and 500 billion. All in BU of course. All modesty aside, unless you're going to be crunching full time for UBT then I'm the only one likely to get to 10 billion in Collatz before 2030, I don't see any point in creating higher ranked groups just yet. Not much point in having a group with just one member in it for the next ten years!
Re. Multiple accounts. If any one has multiple accounts and wants them to be combined, let me know and I'll add the code to treat them as one account. After all, they've done the work regardless of what they were called at the time. I get the data from Boincstats and at present, each account on there is treated as a separate user (hence "Keith" being in there twice ... although he is in fact two different people in this case) Your accounts haven't been combined in the tables above, I'll edit the posts when I get the chance.
At the end of the day, this is for members information only and I'm open to suggestions about how/what they want reporting if anything.
I think I might do individual top ten tables for each division and a top fifty combined as above. Members can then compete in the individual leagues for diversity or the overall one for perseverance. If Traviss wants to go up a place then he only needs one more project at one million, much easier than getting two existing projects to 100 million.
Mark
True and I don't know what the solution is.
Split into GPU and CPU projects? ....But some projects have/had both and there's no telling what the split is/was.
Eliminate retired projects? ... Penalises those that were more active in the past and not so much now. Although I would be prepared to eliminate BU as that was a bit of an outlier and only supported by 35 team members who scored lots of points and skew the results)
The other option is going back to separate leagues for each division. In that case, Traviss is third in the individual millions league and gets a mention for his persistence.
There are five team members already with more than 10 billion, three with more than 100 billion and one with more than 250 and 500 billion. All in BU of course. All modesty aside, unless you're going to be crunching full time for UBT then I'm the only one likely to get to 10 billion in Collatz before 2030, I don't see any point in creating higher ranked groups just yet. Not much point in having a group with just one member in it for the next ten years!
Re. Multiple accounts. If any one has multiple accounts and wants them to be combined, let me know and I'll add the code to treat them as one account. After all, they've done the work regardless of what they were called at the time. I get the data from Boincstats and at present, each account on there is treated as a separate user (hence "Keith" being in there twice ... although he is in fact two different people in this case) Your accounts haven't been combined in the tables above, I'll edit the posts when I get the chance.
At the end of the day, this is for members information only and I'm open to suggestions about how/what they want reporting if anything.
I think I might do individual top ten tables for each division and a top fifty combined as above. Members can then compete in the individual leagues for diversity or the overall one for perseverance. If Traviss wants to go up a place then he only needs one more project at one million, much easier than getting two existing projects to 100 million.
Mark
-
- Active UBT Contributor 15+ yrs
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:00 am
- Location: Halifax, West Yorks.
Re: Millionaires League
Regarding multiple accounts, there's a "Jeffers" in the points table which is a former account of mine. I've tried unsuccessfully a couple of times to get it combined with my current main account under "Jeff Bulmer" without success. To be honest, the points in there aren't particularly significant, just a little over a million. Although, in my current position, that would be enough to push me past the Billion in total!
Re: Millionaires League
Hi Jeff,
I'll combine your two accounts then when I update the tables on Monday.
Mark
I'll combine your two accounts then when I update the tables on Monday.
Mark
-
- Active UBT Contributor 1+ yr
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:56 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Millionaires League
Hi Mark,
I'm not sure either; i think the solution(s) you mentioned would probably be the best way to go. I think whichever route you take, there will be pro's and con's.
Personally I am happy with the existing table as it shows me pretty much what I was interested in seeing.
I'm not sure either; i think the solution(s) you mentioned would probably be the best way to go. I think whichever route you take, there will be pro's and con's.
Personally I am happy with the existing table as it shows me pretty much what I was interested in seeing.
-
- Active UBT Contributor 1+ yr
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:56 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Millionaires League
Hey Mark, I just found this, which is a count all the 'million etc stats' done for each UK BOINC (etc) team member, on each update (I guess). I don't know if this would make things easier/quicker for you..
1 Billion:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/1000m ... BOINC+Team
500 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/500m& ... BOINC+Team
250 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/250m& ... BOINC+Team
100 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/100m& ... BOINC+Team
50 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/50m&t ... BOINC+Team
25 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/25m&t ... BOINC+Team
10 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/10m&t ... BOINC+Team
5 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/5m&team=UK+BOINC+Team
2.5 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/2.5m& ... BOINC+Team
1 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/1m&team=UK+BOINC+Team
1 Billion:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/1000m ... BOINC+Team
500 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/500m& ... BOINC+Team
250 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/250m& ... BOINC+Team
100 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/100m& ... BOINC+Team
50 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/50m&t ... BOINC+Team
25 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/25m&t ... BOINC+Team
10 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/10m&t ... BOINC+Team
5 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/5m&team=UK+BOINC+Team
2.5 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/2.5m& ... BOINC+Team
1 Million:
https://stats.free-dc.org/mmakers/1m&team=UK+BOINC+Team
Re: Millionaires League
Thanks for that Chris, seems to be exactly what I was doing with the Boincstats data so I'm out of a job now
Mark
Mark
-
- Active UBT Contributor 1+ yr
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:56 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Millionaires League
Personally I think your better served coming up with logic for the end table to show rankings, rather than data collection which this site has already done for you.