Had a quick go and created an overall table based on IOC rules (billions first, then 500 millions etc - similar to what Chris suggested)
Code: Select all
1000 500 250 100 10 Millions
Woodles 2 3 3 4 17 35
Hogey 2 2 2 2 2 7
UBT - JohnR 1 2 2 5 9 13
ncoded.com 1 2 2 2 7 13
Temujin 1 1 5 5 10 30
UBT - Timbo 1 1 2 3 6 24
Joshrandom 1 1 2 3 5 7
Keith 1 1 2 2 4 15
UBT - Mikeejones 1 1 1 1 6 12
Tackleway 1 1 1 1 3 6
Richard Whitehurst 1 1 1 1 3 3
Keith 1 1 1 1 2 4
GPUGRID Role account 1 1 1 1 1 1
Zydor 0 2 3 6 7 10
Steven Pinder 0 2 2 2 3 7
UBT-McTooth 0 1 2 4 8 11
Eric 0 1 2 3 4 5
Jeff Bulmer 0 1 2 2 4 7
Nicksphone 0 1 1 2 4 16
ukjohnd 0 1 1 1 4 6
John Sheridan 0 1 1 1 2 3
meddy2065 0 1 1 1 1 2
UBT - mickyb69 0 0 1 2 6 11
TroubledBunny 0 0 1 2 2 3
david 0 0 1 1 3 5
Homefarm 0 0 1 1 2 4
SIN-NOMBRE 0 0 1 1 2 3
Fred Bayliss 0 0 1 1 1 2
GoodFodder 0 0 1 1 1 1
Bambi_72 0 0 0 2 2 3
So a sort of league table.
Personally I'm not sure that GoodFodder with one project scoring more than 250 million (GPUGrid) should be better placed than say Traviss who has 23 projects over the one million mark but doesn't even make the list.
Still, I suppose it does give an idea of what a member needs to improve to move up a position (no point in pushing for that 500 million project if a new, 1,000,000 project will suffice)
I'm open to suggestions for a better overall scoring method.
Mark